The EIC evaluation criteria are akin to an obstacle course. Small divergence in the team, technology, funding plans, financial projections, policy targets, social impacts, or gender equality can lead to strikingly different results.
Many applicants inadvertently embed red flags in their proposal by asking for an ineligible funding amount, defining the TRL incorrectly, setting the wrong project duration, and more. There are dozens if not hundreds of possible red flags, which is why using ChatEIC as a framework is a safe way to avoid most of them. ChatEIC has very defined processes which structure key sections with full EIC alignment in mind. It will automatically reshape most sections to fit the program even if the input diverged from it to increase the quality of the proposal.