BeeOmetrics: Wild bees as low-cost 'natural drones' for parcel-level biodiversity and pollution monitoring

Brussels, November 22nd 2024
Summary
  • BeeOdiversity’s BeeOmetrics project uses wild bees to collect pollen and environmental samples to map biodiversity and pollution at parcel scale.
  • Wild bee monitoring targets an average area of about 40 hectares per sampling station, compared with roughly 700 hectares for managed honeybee hives.
  • The company credits an EIC Transition grant with providing R&D funding and market credibility needed to develop the system.
  • Awards and recognition such as the Trends Impact Award for Ecology and Hello Tomorrow Deep Tech Pioneer status increased visibility but do not replace independent validation or regulatory acceptance.
  • Key challenges remain including client maturity, regulatory shifts, scaling operations and converting environmental data into actionable remediation measures.

BeeOmetrics and the idea of bees as natural drones

In an interview published as part of the European Innovation Council Coffee Break series, Michael van Cutsem, CEO and founder of Belgian greentech scale-up BeeOdiversity, described BeeOmetrics. The project aims to monitor biodiversity and pollution using wild bees. The approach treats bees as 'natural drones' to collect pollen and other environmental traces that can be analysed to infer local soil and plant biodiversity and detect pollutants.

BeeOmetrics:An EIC Transition funded initiative coordinated by BeeOdiversity. BeeOmetrics combines field deployment of wild bee monitoring devices with laboratory analysis of pollen and environmental samples and data science to produce indicators for biodiversity and pollutant pressures at parcel level. The stated objective is to provide actionable measurements that corporates, public authorities, land managers and farmers can use to prioritise interventions.
How the method works:Wild bees naturally forage across the landscape. BeeOdiversity deploys traps or monitoring stations that capture pollen and trace materials carried by these insects. Pollen identification and chemical analysis then produce datasets on plant species presence and on pollutants including agrochemicals and industrial contaminants. The company positions this as a cost efficient alternative to labor intensive plot-by-plot soil and plant surveys.
Monitoring footprint and scale:BeeOdiversity reports that managed domestic honeybee colonies typically represent a sampling footprint of about 700 hectares, which corresponds to a roughly 1.5 kilometre radius. The BeeOmetrics approach using wild bees targets an average coverage of about 40 hectares, which BeeOdiversity frames as a parcel level resolution with a typical 300 metre radius. The smaller footprint is intended to deliver data relevant to single agricultural parcels or specific real estate plots.
Monitoring approachTypical footprintIntended use casesMain trade-offs
Managed honeybee hivesAround 700 ha (approx 1.5 km radius)Broad landscape level biodiversity and pollen flowsLarge area coverage but low spatial resolution for parcel decisions
Wild bee (BeeOmetrics)Around 40 ha (approx 300 m radius)Parcel level monitoring for agriculture, real estate, solar parks, industryHigher spatial resolution but requires denser deployment and consistent wild bee presence
Traditional soil and plant samplingVariable according to sampling designRegulatory compliance, targeted contaminant testing, baseline studiesHigh accuracy per sample but costly and time consuming to scale

Team, multidisciplinary strengths and service offering

BeeOdiversity brings together scientists, bioengineers, biologists and data scientists alongside non-scientific profiles. The company says this multidisciplinary mix helps translate raw biomonitoring data into usable indicators and remediation advice. Beyond BeeOmetrics the organisation offers services branded as BeeOexpertise, BeeOmonitoring, BeeOimpact and BeeOlandscaping. These services include biodiversity strategy, pollutant monitoring, ecological audits, nature-based solutions and ecological design for sites in cities, agriculture, industry and real estate.

Funding, recognition and what they mean

Michael van Cutsem told the EIC Community that securing intensive R&D funding was a critical hurdle and that the EIC grant provided both financial support and a credibility boost. BeeOdiversity has also won awards including the Trends Impact Award for Ecology and was selected as a Deep Tech Pioneer by Hello Tomorrow. The company says these accolades raise its visibility and help build partnerships.

EIC Transition grant:Part of the European Innovation Council portfolio. The Transition scheme focuses on maturing innovations towards commercial or investment readiness by supporting activities such as validation, prototyping and market preparation. For recipients like BeeOdiversity the grant can fund R&D, enable pilot deployments and act as a signal of vetting by a major EU instrument.

Challenges, caveats and the path to operational uptake

Van Cutsem noted structural challenges. These include fast moving regulatory changes, varied client readiness to adopt nature positive tools, and the rapid arrival of competing or complementary technologies. For a small company those dynamics demand agility and continual investment in R&D. Converting environmental indicators into verified remediation pathways and convincing corporates and public bodies to act remain non trivial tasks.

Validation and limits to current claims:BeeOdiversity frames BeeOmetrics as cost effective and scalable, but those claims need independent verification if the system is to be adopted for regulatory monitoring or liability purposes. Biomonitoring via pollinators can reveal presence of plant species and contaminants but the quantitative relationship between pollen traces and pollutant concentrations in soil or crops requires careful calibration and peer reviewed validation.

Market and policy context in the EU

Nature based monitoring fits broader EU priorities on biodiversity and pollution control. The Commission and member states are increasing focus on contaminants such as PFAS and on measuring biodiversity outcomes. Innovations that reduce monitoring costs while producing comparable data could help public authorities and industry comply with future regulatory requirements. However the pathway from pilot projects to accepted monitoring standards requires reproducible methods, transparency on data processing and alignment with policy frameworks.

Clients, sectors and practical deployment

BeeOdiversity targets multiple sectors. Agriculture, real estate developers, solar park operators and industrial site managers are named customers because they need parcel level data to make management or remediation decisions. The company says the lower cost per parcel of wild bee monitoring makes it possible to scale to more sites than conventional sampling. That will require operational capacity to deploy and service monitoring stations across many plots and to ensure consistent wild bee activity where needed.

Recognition, governance and founder perspectives

Winning the Trends Impact Award for Ecology and being named a Hello Tomorrow Deep Tech Pioneer were presented as motivating and reputationally valuable. Van Cutsem also reflected on leadership influences and personal practices. He cited Yvon Chouinard of Patagonia and adventurer Mike Horn as inspirations for governance choices and personal courage to pursue meaningful work. On a personal level Van Cutsem said he has reduced business travel, buys fewer clothes and is experimenting with heated clothing as a way to lower home energy use. At company level an internal taskforce is focused on reducing the organisation’s ecological footprint through measures on mobility, meals, recycling and office energy use.

Geography, contacts and next steps

BeeOdiversity develops projects across several European countries, Switzerland and the United States and is headquartered in Brussels. The BeeOmetrics project is described on CORDIS and on the project website. The EIC Community article frames BeeOdiversity as an example of how EIC funding can support nature based innovation but also highlights ongoing challenges in moving from pilots to widespread adoption.

Conclusion and a cautious outlook

BeeOmetrics is an interesting instance of turning ecological behaviour into monitoring data. If the method reliably links pollen and pollinator traces to pollutant loads and biodiversity indicators at parcel scale it could fill a real gap in scalable environmental measurement. For now the approach remains subject to operational constraints, the need for independent validation and the usual hurdles for early stage environmental technologies in securing market traction and regulatory acceptance. The EIC grant and industry recognition de risk some early stages but do not remove these fundamental requirements.