Diapath and the EIC GHG Tool: How an Italian pathology SME began a structured carbon reduction journey
- ›Diapath, an Italian SME producing anatomic pathology instruments and reagents, used the EIC GHG Tool to quantify its carbon footprint and identify mitigation priorities.
- ›Participation moved the company from informal environmental concern to a structured plan including CO2 calculation, strategic project selection and a signed commitment to reduce emissions.
- ›Planned measures include on-site solar PV to supply more than half of electricity needs, product redesign to cut transport and equipment energy use, and recyclable packaging.
- ›Diapath reports early benefits such as staff engagement and reduced energy costs but notes the medical sector faces regulatory and practical limits to rapid decarbonisation.
- ›The EIC GHG Tool offered a science based approach and expert guidance but the tool is no longer in use and external verification is recommended to validate reported outcomes.
Diapath and the green transition: from awareness to an organised emissions reduction plan
Diapath is an Italian small or medium enterprise that designs and supplies instruments and reagents used in anatomic pathology laboratories, hospitals and research centres around the world. In 2022 the company took part in the European Innovation Council Greenhouse Gas Programme. The programme included an EIC GHG Tool used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions, simulate mitigation options and identify strategic projects that would most reduce the company’s footprint. Diapath reports that the exercise moved it from a general awareness of environmental issues to a structured action plan and a formal commitment to reduce emissions.
Who is Diapath and what drives its innovation
Diapath positions itself as a leading Italian SME in the anatomic pathology field. The company says it invests about eight percent of turnover in research and development each year. That investment has produced two dozen patents and several trademarks. The Innovation Department was established in 2019 under Dr Carmelo Lupo and follows a multidisciplinary, experimental research approach. Staff interviewed for the EIC feature identify the company mission as improving diagnostic quality for pathologists and patients while increasing usability, reliability, safety and ecological sensitivity of products.
What the EIC GHG Programme offered and how Diapath used it
The EIC GHG Programme ran from January 2021 until December 2022. It offered participating EIC beneficiaries a tool that aligned with the internationally recognised GHG Protocol and sought to help startups and SMEs assess their emissions and model mitigation measures compatible with EU objectives. Diapath joined the initiative to obtain a structured assessment of its greenhouse gas emissions and to define strategic projects with the highest potential to reduce its footprint.
Why the exercise mattered to Diapath
Before the programme Diapath had a general interest in environmental issues but had not undertaken a specific structured pathway to measure and reduce its emissions. Using the GHG Tool the company completed a CO2 calculation and then identified and prioritised strategic projects. This led Diapath to obtain two programme badges and to sign a letter of commitment to reduce emissions in coming years.
Constraints that shape low carbon options in medical products
Diapath operates in a regulated area where many products are chemical reagents that come into contact with biological materials. International rules for disposal classify such wastes as special waste and impose strict handling and disposal obligations. These constraints limit some commonly used circular economy options and mean that changes need careful design to remain compliant with health and safety rules.
Measures implemented and planned
Diapath enumerated several structural and product level measures it is implementing or planning. The company emphasised that fast growth makes absolute reductions difficult but described a mix of energy, product and packaging measures intended to reduce emissions and operating costs.
| Measure | Scope and description | Reported or expected impact |
| Solar photovoltaic installation | On-site solar panels to produce electricity for internal use | Target to cover more than 50 percent of company electricity needs and reduce energy costs |
| Product redesign projects | Developing instruments and reagent systems to lower transport needs and reduce energy consumption of installed equipment | Lower footprint from logistics and customer-side energy use; details and quantitative estimates not provided |
| Recyclable packaging | Move packaging materials to recyclable formats where possible while respecting product safety | Reduces waste sent to special disposal streams and supports circularity goals |
| Organisational actions | Targets across packaging, technology, work practices and mobility; staff engagement and internal awareness | Improved employee motivation and potential indirect emissions reductions |
Early outcomes and return on investment
Diapath reports nonfinancial and financial benefits from its initial activities. Internal engagement increased, which the company cites as important for embedding change. Energy cost reductions from efficiency measures and on-site generation were reported as significant so far. The company also values external validation as it helps stakeholders evaluate reported results and bolsters credibility.
What Diapath found useful about the EIC GHG Tool
According to Diapath the value of the EIC tool was the science based approach and the expert guidance provided while framing the company structure and the types of purchased and sold products. They say that expert input helped translate general environmental intent into concrete strategic projects. The company reports the ideas and recommendations will influence decisions at product design and organisational levels.
Limits and broader sector implications
Diapath highlighted a structural issue that affects many medical suppliers. The medical sector is comparatively slow to adopt sustainability measures because safety, regulation and patient care imperatives create additional constraints and costs. Diapath described the mission as long and challenging but argued the sector must engage because its carbon footprint is large and because sustainability is aligned with the sector purpose of protecting health.
A cautious reading of Diapath’s claims is warranted. The company presents planned measures and initial benefits but does not publish full quantitative baselines or third party verified emissions reductions. The EIC GHG Tool itself is reported by the EIC Community as no longer in use, which raises questions about continuity of support and about how companies will access similar services going forward.
Analysis and takeaways for EU innovation policy
Diapath’s experience illustrates a common sequence for SMEs in the EU innovation ecosystem. Firms often hold an informal commitment to environmental concerns but lack the data, tools and expert support to define credible decarbonisation plans. Interventions by programmes such as the EIC can accelerate that process by providing methodologies and advisory help. However policy makers and funders should also ensure continuity of tools and systems for verification so that companies can credibly report progress to investors, regulators and customers.
Final reflections from Diapath
Diapath emphasises transparency in accounting, trackable methodologies, and open communication about collection processes and analyses. The company aspires to be a best practice example in a slow moving sector. Its story is one of early commitment and pragmatic planning rather than quick fixes. It shows how a small, R&D intensive firm can begin aligning product design, operations and organisational behaviour with emissions reduction goals while navigating regulatory and technical constraints.
More information and next steps
The European Innovation Council previously made the EIC GHG Tool available to beneficiaries to calculate footprints and simulate mitigation measures. The EIC Community now reports that the tool is no longer in use and that new activities will be announced. Companies that took part in the programme including Diapath can use their experience to pursue internal projects and seek external validation. Stakeholders should watch for successor services from the EIC and consider third party verification as a next step to substantiate emissions claims.
If you are an EIC-funded company interested in reducing CO2 emissions consult the EIC Community for updates on available tools and support.

