EIC ePitching on Quantum, Semiconductors and Photonics: who presented, who listened, and what it means for Europe’s deep tech funding

Brussels, October 14th 2024
Summary
  • Nine EIC-backed deep tech companies in quantum, semiconductors and photonics pitched to 19 investors during an ePitching session on 25 September.
  • Presentations covered hardware-heavy innovations from compact datacenter quantum machines to ferroelectric memory, processing-in-memory chips, photonic QKD and spectral ground-penetrating radar.
  • Founders said the EIC’s investor-readiness support improved visibility and accelerated investor conversations, but both founders and VCs stressed public funding is complementary to private capital for scaling capital-intensive deep tech.
  • Investors at the session included specialised quantum funds and large corporate and financial investors who value EIC awards as a technical and execution proof point.
  • The EIC Investor Readiness & Outreach Programme, part of the EIC Business Acceleration Services, offers matchmaking, coaching and introductions but cannot substitute long lead times and high capital needs of semiconductor and quantum ventures.

EIC ePitching on Quantum, Semiconductors and Photonics

On 25 September an online pitching session organised by the European Innovation Council brought nine EIC-supported companies working in quantum technologies, semiconductors and photonics before a panel of 19 investors. The event formed part of the EIC Investor Readiness and Outreach Programme which sits inside the EIC’s Business Acceleration Services. The format is explicitly about investor readiness and outreach and about providing curated exposure to venture capital and corporate investors for awardees of the EIC Accelerator and related EIC instruments.

Who pitched and what they claimed

The nine presenting companies represented a mix of early and scale-stage deep techs focused on hardware and systems integration. Their propositions ranged from compact quantum computers designed to fit in datacentres to sensors for semiconductor failure analysis and a spectral ground-penetrating radar system. The session attracted interest from specialised quantum funds and mainstream VCs and corporates that allocate into deep tech.

CompanyCore technologyPrimary application / claim
Equal1Silicon spin-qubit quantum processors and integrated QSoC architectureRack-mounted compact quantum computers for datacentres and on-premise deployment
FERROELECTRIC MEMORY GMBH (FMC)Non-volatile ferroelectric memoryHigh-speed, low-cost AI memory applications
INNATERA NANOSYSTEMS BVEnergy-efficient brain-inspired microprocessorsSensor-level AI for battery-powered human-machine interface devices
LuxQuanta Technologies SLContinuous-variable Quantum Key Distribution (CV-QKD) on photonic integrated chipsPlug-and-play quantum-safe encryption for existing optical fibre infrastructure
NewPhotonics LtdPhotonic chipsEnergy-efficient data centre photonics
QuantumDiamonds GmbHDiamond-based quantum sensing (NV-diamond microscopy)High-resolution quantum sensing for semiconductor manufacturing and failure analysis
SAS UPMEMProcessing In Memory (PIM) chipsEfficient compute for Generative AI workloads
SIPEARLNext-generation microprocessors for HPCProcessors optimised for AI-focused datacentres and high-performance computing
WIDMO Spectral TechnologiesSpectral Ground Penetrating Radar (SGPR) and cloud processingDeep subsurface tomography for mining, construction and environmental use cases

Technical concepts explained

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD):QKD uses quantum states of light to generate and share cryptographic keys with security that is grounded in quantum physics rather than algorithmic complexity. In practice QKD systems send extremely weak optical pulses and detect any intruder by the disturbance such an intrusion causes. Continuous-variable QKD is one implementation that uses analog measurements of field quadratures and promises integration on photonic chips, which can reduce cost and size compared to bulk optical setups.
Processing-In-Memory (PIM):PIM embeds compute capabilities into memory arrays to avoid the energy and latency cost of moving data between memory and processors. For AI workloads and large models, reducing data movement can significantly improve energy efficiency and throughput. PIM is not a single architecture and maturity differs by vendor and use case.
Ferroelectric memory:Ferroelectric memories use a ferroelectric material for the memory cell to store polarization states as non-volatile bits. They offer the promise of fast random access, low write energy and non-volatility. Industry adoption requires reliable integration with CMOS processes, endurance testing and competitive cost at scale.
Spin qubits and Quantum System-on-Chip (QSoC):Spin qubits manipulate the spin of electrons in silicon or other hosts. They can benefit from long coherence times in purified silicon and from established CMOS fabrication processes. A QSoC ambition integrates quantum elements with classical control and readout electronics on one chip or package. That tight integration can reduce overheads but also raises engineering complexity for cryogenics, interconnects and error correction.
Spectral Ground Penetrating Radar (SGPR):SGPR extends classical GPR by using a broader spectral analysis and dedicated software to produce subsurface tomographies with deeper penetration and higher resolution. WIDMO claims penetration beyond 40 metres with high resolution and an in-house tech stack combining hardware and cloud-based processing. Commercialisation hinges on reliability across soil types and integration into industry workflows.

Founders’ takeaways from the event

Founders who pitched described the ePitching session as efficient exposure to a concentrated set of relevant investors and useful mentoring on the pitch itself. Sumeet Kumar, CEO of Innatera Nanosystems based in the Netherlands, said the event exceeded expectations because it brought deep tech investors who understood their product and market. He highlighted that the EIC’s involvement eased conversations with private investors and helped with visibility. As Sumeet put it, "That is a very positive thing that I found inside of the event." He also noted that public support helps to build local sovereign capabilities that can attract more private capital.

Vanessa Diaz, CEO of LuxQuanta in Barcelona, described a practical benefit from the EIC accelerator. She said the Accelerator improves both funding prospects and visibility and that preparation support condensed months of communications work into a much shorter investor-ready pitch. Her assessment was practical and upbeat while emphasising that EIC backing makes private rounds smaller and easier to close because it acts as a signal to private investors.

Investors’ perspective and how they use EIC signals

Investors at the event ranged from boutique quantum funds to generalist and corporate investors. Several attendees said the EIC award acts as a valuable proof point for both the underlying science and the founder’s ability to execute. They also stressed that venture funding and public research grants serve different roles along the innovation chain.

Kris Kaczmarek from 2xN, a quantum-focused venture fund, highlighted that the curated selection at the ePitching helped him compare technical approaches across companies and open new lines of enquiry. He was clear that VC capital is not a substitute for basic or expensive research funding. Public grants can carry early-stage technology risk and de-risk key milestones that later make companies investible.

Olivier Tonneau, partner and co-founder at Quantonation, said EIC grants are "the mark of a very serious and well-thought project." For an early-stage quantum investor, he looks at quality science, the strength of the team, and a realistic roadmap to productisation. He also described the event as an efficient deal sourcing channel and plans to systematically screen EIC recipients for opportunities.

Practical limits acknowledged by investors

Across conversations investors reiterated two practical cautions. First, hardware-heavy deep tech requires long timelines and stepwise de-risking. VC is best at scaling commercial pathways once sufficient technical risk has been removed. Second, public awards like EIC funding help credibility but do not guarantee commercial traction or subsequent private rounds. The typical investor playbook remains discovery of product-market fit, reference customers and manufacturing scale.

Who was in the room - investor roster

The ePitching session gave companies access to a broad investor jury from Europe and beyond. Listed participants included venture funds, corporate venture arms and large financial institutions with deep tech allocations.

Representative investors and firmsType
Atlantic LabsVC
Amadeus Capital PartnersVC
Cycle GroupVC / Climate
Deeptech Equity NLVC
DTCF - DeepTech & Climate FondsGrowth / public-private fund
ElaiaVC
EuroUS VenturesVC
Goldman SachsInvestment bank / investor
IFC - International Finance CorporationDevelopment finance
IMECResearch and industry R&D partner
LIFTTVC
MatterwaveVC
MIG CapitalVC
Photon VenturesPhotonics-focused VC
Privilege VenturesVC
QuantonationQuantum-focused VC
RedstoneVC
Samsung VenturesCorporate VC
Sopra SteriaCorporate venture / systems integrator
TRUMPF VentureCorporate VC
Vektor PartnersVC
World FundVC / impact

Why EIC readiness programmes matter and what they offer

The EIC Investor Readiness and Outreach Programme aims to improve the preparedness of EIC Accelerator innovators for investment. It provides coaching, pitch feedback, benchmarking, introductions and matchmaking events such as ePitchings and Investor Days. The EIC Business Acceleration Services also include procurement matchmaking, corporate days and international soft-landing support.

EIC Accelerator support formats:Support can take the form of blended financing under the EIC Accelerator, as well as non-dilutive grants and coaching. Founders repeatedly told investors that combining EIC equity and grant awards with private rounds improves signal to follow-on investors. The EIC also claims measurable outputs from its BAS programmes including thousands of one-to-one meetings and hundreds of direct introductions.
EIC BAS metricValue (as quoted by EIC)
Companies supported by EIC Investor Readiness and Outreach+350
Satisfaction rate98%
Direct introductions made between EIC Fund companies and investors+500
Aggregate outcomes from BAS since 2021 (selected)20,000 one-on-one meetings, 595 deals, EUR 350 million raised through investor outreach

What to watch and what remains uncertain

The session highlighted promising technical directions in Europe but also underscored typical deep tech risks. Many pitching companies made assertive commercial claims. For example, one company promoted shipping rack-mounted quantum hardware in H1 2025 and others publicised major planned investments or funding rounds. Those statements should be treated as forward-looking and subject to technical milestones, supply-chain readiness and funding being secured. Historically, hardware and quantum companies face long development curves and high capital intensity.

A second pragmatic point is that integration into industry workflows and qualification by buyers is often the hardest step. Technologies such as QKD need integration into telecom operations and standards alignment. Semiconductor testing platforms need to demonstrate throughput and robustness at wafer scale. Photonic chips must show cost competitiveness versus incumbent electronic options at system level. Each of those steps requires follow-on capital and commercial partnerships.

Implications for Europe’s deep tech ecosystem

The event is a reminder that Europe’s public funding and accelerator infrastructure can create deal flow and reduce matching friction between public-backed innovators and private investors. EIC awards remain powerful signals for investors seeking technology validation. At the same time investors and founders are aligned on two points. First, public funding does not replace patient private capital. Second, there is growing investor appetite for hardware-focused European startups where sovereign capabilities matter, but that appetite depends on demonstrable technical milestones and credible commercial pathways.

For policy makers the takeaway is also practical. Building industrial sovereignty in semiconductors, photonics and quantum requires continued public investment in research, pilot lines, foundry access and talent development alongside instruments that push companies toward commercial milestones and private finance readiness. The EIC and research hubs such as imec play complementary roles in that landscape by providing both research infrastructure and investor-facing validation.

Final note and realistic expectations

Events such as this ePitching are effective at increasing visibility and accelerating conversations. They are not a replacement for the long operational work founders must do to industrialise devices, qualify products and secure customers. Investors and founders alike should retain healthy scepticism about milestone timelines and treat public awards as important but not definitive steps on the path to commercial success.