EIC-backed inbiome wins FDA Breakthrough Device designation for Molecular Culture diagnostic
- ›Inbiome's Molecular Culture ID has received Breakthrough Device Designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
- ›The company says the test can detect more than 200 bacterial species in a single assay and deliver results within hours.
- ›Inbiome is running hospital implementation trials, adding antimicrobial resistance testing, and plans a U.S. market entry by early 2026.
- ›The project is supported by an EIC Accelerator award under Horizon Europe and inbiome recently added PCR pioneer Carl Wittwer to its advisory board.
- ›The Breakthrough designation can accelerate review but does not guarantee marketing approval or clinical adoption.
FDA grants Breakthrough Device designation to inbiome's Molecular Culture ID
The EIC Accelerator beneficiary inbiome announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted Breakthrough Device Designation to Molecular Culture ID, the companys proprietary test for bacterial diagnostics. The company presents the designation as recognition of the technology's potential to change how bacterial infections are detected and treated.
What the FDA Breakthrough Device designation means
How Molecular Culture is described
Inbiome positions Molecular Culture as a broad, same-day bacterial diagnostic that can detect and identify more than 200 bacterial species from clinical samples in a single assay. The company says the test dramatically shortens time to result from days to hours, can find bacteria that are uncultivable or have been exposed to antibiotics, and improves sensitivity versus traditional culture methods. Inbiome reports a 20 percent increase in correctly diagnosed positive samples compared with traditional culture and states the assay can produce actionable results within about four hours.
Technical approach and laboratory requirements
| Specification | Details |
| Claimed time to result | Results in hours, company cites approximately 4 hours |
| Species coverage | Company says >200 bacterial species and 'all' bacteria in a sample |
| Technical basis | Length polymorphisms of interspace region and 16S rDNA polymorphisms |
| Sample types validated | Pus aspirates, punctate, drain fluid, synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, joint aspirate, water and various tissue specimens |
| CE/IVD status | Kit and certain instruments cited as CE/IVD marked |
| Validated instruments | ABI 3500, ABI 3500 XL, SeqStudio Flex (CE/IVD marked) |
| Kit contents | 24-sample kit, mastermix with internal control, positive control (IS-pro eMix) |
| Detected phyla | Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria |
Clinical development, EIC support and trials
As part of an EIC-funded project, inbiome is conducting an implementation trial of Molecular Culture in a live hospital setting. Activities listed by the company include optimizing the user interface for hospital workflows, clinically validating additional sample types, integrating anti-microbial resistance testing into the workflow, and strengthening commercial capabilities ahead of scale up.
People, advisory board and company roadmap
Inbiome recently added Professor Carl Wittwer to its advisory board. Wittwer is widely credited with contributions to modern PCR instruments and diagnostics and was a founder of companies that commercialised PCR-based products. Inbiome says Wittwer will provide technical and commercial guidance as it prepares for U.S. market entry.
The company has stated a planned U.S. introduction of the technology by early 2026. Inbiome also frames Molecular Culture ID as the first in a pipeline of diagnostic technologies intended to reach a goal of same-day diagnostics for all infectious diseases by 2030.
Regulatory and commercial caveats to consider
The FDA Breakthrough Device designation can shorten the feedback loop with regulators and facilitate a more efficient review. It does not mean a product is clinically validated, marketed, or reimbursed. In addition, claims made by the company about coverage, sensitivity gains, and time to result require independent verification and peer reviewed clinical data to be broadly accepted by clinicians and hospital laboratories.
Practical adoption in hospitals will hinge on multiple factors beyond analytical performance. These include clinical validation in target populations, demonstration of impact on clinical decision making and patient outcomes, compatibility with existing laboratory workflows and instruments, scalability of manufacturing, cost and reimbursement pathways in different health systems, and local regulatory approvals.
Antimicrobial resistance testing is complex
Adding antimicrobial resistance testing into a diagnostic workflow is technically feasible but operationally demanding. Genotypic resistance markers do not always predict phenotypic susceptibility and vice versa. Any AMR module will require careful validation, clinical correlation, and transparent reporting of limitations if it is to be relied upon for guiding therapy decisions.
Timeline and next milestones
| Date or period | Milestone |
| 2023 | Inbiome receives EIC Accelerator support under Horizon Europe |
| 28 October 2024 | FDA grants Breakthrough Device Designation to Molecular Culture ID |
| 2024 to 2025 | Ongoing hospital implementation trial, workflow optimisation, additional validation and AMR testing integration |
| Planned early 2026 | Company states intention to enter U.S. market |
| Through 2030 | Company goal to expand same-day diagnostics to all infectious diseases |
Why this matters and what to watch
If independent clinical studies confirm the companys performance claims, a broadly capable, same-day bacterial diagnostic could change hospital practice and reduce unnecessary empiric antibiotic use. That outcome would have implications for patient outcomes and efforts to limit antimicrobial resistance.
Short term indicators to monitor are publication of peer reviewed clinical validation data, the FDA review pathway and specific regulatory milestones, real world performance in the ongoing hospital trial, evidence of cost effectiveness, and agreements with hospital laboratories or larger diagnostics distributors for scale up and distribution.
Stakeholders should remain cautious about corporate performance claims until those independent data appear. Breakthrough Device status is a useful step but it is only one part of a longer and uncertain pathway from promising technology to routine clinical practice.

