EIC Venture Building's Opportunities' Exploration phase completes onboarding as experts deliver feasibility assessments and FTO reports

Brussels, October 4th 2024
Summary
  • The EIC Tech to Market Venture Building Programme has finished onboarding the last cohort of 27 projects in its Opportunities' Exploration phase.
  • Across this phase the Programme will deliver 97 Feasibility Assessment Studies and has issued 34 Freedom to Operate reports so far.
  • Experts working with the teams praise the technical quality of projects but highlight weaknesses in team composition and commercial readiness.
  • Researchers are advised to treat business building as a distinct expertise, to be patient about commercialisation timelines, and to engage actively with programme services.
  • The Venture Building activities wrap up at the end of the year and the broader T2M Programme is paused until a planned restart in 2026.

Opportunities' Exploration phase closes onboarding as EIC delivers feasibility reviews and FTOs

The EIC Tech to Market Venture Building Programme has completed onboarding the final group of 27 projects into its second phase, called Opportunities' Exploration. The phase is scheduled to produce 97 Feasibility Assessment Studies in total. To date, 34 Freedom to Operate reports have been delivered to EIC beneficiaries. The activities target EIC Pathfinder and Transition projects and pair them with outside experts to evaluate technical, team and business feasibility and to recommend next steps for venture building.

What the Opportunities' Exploration phase provided

The phase brought together 97 EIC-funded research projects with a roster of external specialists. The experts performed structured feasibility assessments that look beyond technical proof of concept. Their remit includes assessing whether the research can be translated into a viable product, whether the founding team has the skills to become a startup, and which business or market risks remain. The effort also produced Freedom to Operate reports for many teams. These are legal assessments that examine the intellectual property landscape around a technology and identify potential patent conflicts.

Feasibility Assessment Studies:Structured reviews that combine technical appraisal, market and customer analysis, and team evaluation. They are designed to identify the most important gaps that block a research project from becoming a commercial product. They do not guarantee success but aim to prioritise next steps and de-risk early decisions.
Freedom to Operate reports:Legal investigations of existing patents and IP rights that could prevent commercialisation. An FTO flags potential infringement risks and suggests mitigation options such as design-arounds, licensing or additional IP filings. An FTO reduces legal uncertainty but it is not a final clearance to market.
MetricCount or statusComment
Projects in final onboarded group27Last cohort added to Opportunities' Exploration
Feasibility Assessment Studies97Planned for this phase across Pathfinder and Transition projects
Freedom to Operate reports delivered so far34FTOs are ongoing for other teams
Projects engaged in the phase97EIC Pathfinder and Transition beneficiaries

Voices from the experts: praise and constructive critique

The EIC spoke with two experts who have been advising project teams in the Opportunities' Exploration activities. Their feedback highlights strengths in Europe’s research base and recurring weaknesses that block commercial progress.

Kaija Pöysti said she was impressed with the level and variety of innovations and the research behind them. She observed that many projects provide a good technical basis for commercialisation but still need development on business aspects. She added that programmes like EIC T2M are important because they "bring the business aspect in at early enough stage."

Rocco Barone described the technologies he has seen as "very promising and fascinating" with strong technical development. At the same time he has repeatedly noticed shortcomings in "the composition of the teams as well as a marginal consideration of the commercial aspects."

Both experts offered practical advice for researchers considering entrepreneurship. Rocco urged patience and persistence and warned that product development and commercialisation are different from academic projects. He said, "the creation and commercialisation of a product is very different than an academic project, sometimes harder, and it requires several years of patience and hard work to succeed." Kaija emphasised that business building is an expertise in its own right and recommended valuing the guidance and networks these programmes provide. She also highlighted that interdisciplinary expert input is a strength of the Programme and that active participation by researchers improves outcomes.

A strategic view from an expert:Rocco framed the Programme as a strategic instrument for Europe. He said it "represents an extraordinary way for researchers to bring their ideas to the market. It is a cornerstone of a strategic plan for Europe to transform the strong academic research of our universities into valuable products and companies." He added that the Programme can help Europe improve its global competitiveness in entrepreneurship, while the longer term results will depend on follow-on funding, talent retention and market adoption.

What this means for researchers and teams

The Programme’s work is practical rather than celebratory. Feasibility studies and FTOs give teams specific gaps to address. Typical issues flagged by experts include the absence of business or commercial lead roles, unclear go to market pathways, immature IP strategies, and a tendency to treat commercialization as a downstream activity rather than as an integral part of project planning. Teams that act on expert recommendations will still need time and follow-on resources to scale.

Team composition matters:Technical founders often lack commercial experience. Venture creation typically requires founders or early hires with product, regulatory, sales or operations experience. Programmes that include talent brokerage and entrepreneurs in residence aim to plug that gap, but successful team building requires incentives and often external hires.
Commercial readiness is different from technical readiness:A working prototype or laboratory validation does not equal product market fit. Commercial readiness includes customer validation, regulatory pathway mapping, unit economics and channel strategies. Feasibility studies should surface which of these areas need immediate attention.

Programme context, timing and next steps

The EIC Tech to Market Venture Building Programme is one strand of the EIC’s broader support to move innovations from Pathfinder and Transition research into the market. The Venture Building path follows four main phases: Tech Demo Days, Opportunities' Exploration, Team Creation, and Venture Support Services. Until December 2024 the Venture Building activities were implemented by external service providers contracted by the EIC. The Programme’s broader Tech to Market activities are currently paused and expected to resume in 2026.

Core Venture Building phases:Tech Demo Days provide early market feedback. Opportunities' Exploration delivers feasibility and IP assessments. Team Creation combines recruitment, entrepreneurs in residence and talent brokerage. Venture Support Services cover needs analysis and targeted advice on IP, finance and HR.

The EIC notes that the Venture Building activities will conclude by the end of the year. That timing means teams who have engaged with the phase must secure follow-on support and make use of the recommendations quickly to sustain momentum.

Practical next steps and where to get help

Researchers interested in the Programme or needing more information are directed to the EIC Community platform. For specific enquiries the EIC Community helpdesk accepts messages where the subject can be set to "EIC T2M Venture Building Programme." Calls for experts and expressions of interest for entrepreneurs in residence had been open during the implementation period but are currently closed and expected to reopen in 2026.

Programmes like this reduce certain early stage risks but they do not remove the hard realities of commercialisation. Feasibility studies and FTOs are useful inputs. They are not guarantees of successful market entry. Continued investment, realistic timelines and a focus on team composition remain decisive factors for whether research turns into sustainable companies.

Disclaimer and closing note

The information in this article is based on EIC Community reporting and interviews with participating experts. It is provided for information and knowledge sharing and should not be interpreted as the official position of the European Commission. Readers should treat planned outputs and claimed strategic impacts as conditional on implementation, follow-on funding and market uptake.