IQM Raises $320M Series B to Accelerate Roadmap Toward Fault Tolerant Quantum Computing, with EIC Participation

Brussels, September 11th 2025
Summary
  • IQM Quantum Computers announced a $320 million Series B raise, bringing total financing to about $600 million.
  • The round was led by U.S. cybersecurity investor Ten Eleven Ventures with increased backing from Finnish investor Tesi and participation from EIC and several pension and strategic investors.
  • IQM says the funds will accelerate a roadmap from noisy intermediate scale systems toward error corrected machines that could scale from thousands to millions of qubits.
  • The company credits earlier EIC Accelerator support for technological advances such as a reported 99.8 percent two qubit gate fidelity in its Prometheus project.
  • Scaling to error corrected, million‑qubit machines faces major technical, manufacturing, and market challenges that will require sustained investment, supply chain resilience, and new software and algorithmic advances.

IQM raises $320 million Series B as it pushes toward error corrected quantum systems

IQM Quantum Computers, a Finland headquartered company that builds superconducting quantum hardware and full stack systems, announced on 3 September 2025 that it raised $320 million, about €275 million, in a Series B financing round. The company says the new capital brings total funding to roughly $600 million and will be used to scale fabrication, data centre infrastructure and assembly capacity, expand commercial presence in the United States and other markets, and accelerate development toward fault tolerant quantum processors capable of supporting many more qubits than today.

Who invested and what they say

The Series B was led by Ten Eleven Ventures, a U.S. investor focused on cybersecurity, marking IQM’s first U.S. lead investor. Existing investor Tesi increased its commitment. Other participants named by IQM include Finnish pension funds Elo and Varma, strategic investors from the Schwarz Group and Winbond Electronics Corporation, and public or regional investors such as Bayern Kapital and the European Innovation Council, listed among participants. Goldman Sachs International acted as sole placement agent and Ten Eleven partner Alex Doll will join IQM’s board.

ItemDetailSource / Note
Series B size$320 million (approx. €275 million)IQM press release, 3 September 2025
Total funding to date$600 millionIQM statement
Lead investorTen Eleven VenturesCybersecurity focused U.S. firm
Major returning investorTesi (Finnish Industry Investment)Increased commitment
Other participantsElo, Varma, Companies of Schwarz Group, Winbond, Bayern Kapital, EICPension funds, strategic investors, public investors
Placement agentGoldman Sachs InternationalSole placement agent
Board changeAlex Doll (Ten Eleven) joins boardIQM announcement

What IQM plans to do with the cash

IQM says the capital will be allocated to three broad areas. First, the company will expand chip fabrication capacity in Finland and advance manufacturing methods to support larger error corrected processors. Second, it will scale data centre and assembly infrastructure globally to support both on premises deliveries and cloud access. Third, IQM will push the technology roadmap toward large, error corrected systems with the goal of reaching quantum advantage in the 2030s, according to company statements. IQM also highlighted a continued focus on commercial growth in the United States and other markets.

On-premises versus cloud offerings:IQM sells both on-premise full stack systems to customers such as HPC centres and enterprises and provides cloud access to its machines. On-premise systems appeal to institutions that require local control, low-latency access, and integration into existing HPC workflows. Cloud access supports broader experimentation and remote users. Expanding both channels requires different investments in logistics, site infrastructure, cryogenics, security and customer support.

Technology foundations and prior EIC-backed progress

IQM’s public materials point to a development path that began with small superconducting quantum processors and progressed through projects supported by European Innovation Council programmes. The company cites a past EIC Accelerator funded project called Prometheus, from roughly 2020 to 2022, where its qubit-coupler design and fabrication methods were advanced. IQM reports a demonstrated two qubit gate fidelity of 99.8 percent as part of that work. The company also highlights progress in quantum integrated device fabrication and packages that combine planar and 3D integrated chips and modules.

Two qubit gate fidelity and why it matters:Gate fidelity measures how accurately a quantum gate implements the intended quantum operation. A 99.8 percent two qubit fidelity means that an ideal gate and the real gate agree 99.8 percent of the time in the experiments reported by the company. High two qubit fidelity is a necessary ingredient for useful quantum computing, but it is not sufficient on its own for large scale systems. Scaling to many qubits amplifies the effects of even small errors and requires error correction, control electronics, calibrations, system integration and manufacturing yield improvements.
Planar and 3D integration in superconducting systems:Planar chips place qubits and control circuitry on a two dimensional surface similar to conventional semiconductor chips. 3D integration stacks or combines modules to increase connectivity and reduce wiring congestion. Combining the two approaches aims to improve scalability and preserve coherence times. Both approaches introduce fabrication complexity, thermal and mechanical challenges and new failure modes that must be managed at scale.

Key technical concepts explained

NISQ era:Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum or NISQ refers to current generation devices with tens to a few hundred qubits that are noisy and not error corrected. NISQ machines are useful for early experiments and algorithm development but have limited scope for delivering consistent practical advantage on industry scale problems.
Fault tolerance and quantum error correction:Fault tolerant quantum computing means running algorithms with logical qubits that are encoded across many physical qubits and protected by error correction codes. Achieving fault tolerance requires orders of magnitude more physical qubits than logical qubits and robust control, readout and cooling infrastructure. The transition from noisy devices to error corrected systems is the central technical hurdle on the path to scaled quantum computing.
Cryogenic infrastructure and control electronics:Superconducting qubits operate at millikelvin temperatures. This demands cryogenic refrigerators, wiring and control electronics that work at low temperature or interface reliably between room temperature and the cryostat. Scaling up qubit counts increases the demands on heat load, wiring complexity, and control channel density. Manufacturing and operating these systems at data centre scale is non trivial and costly.

Why this raise matters for the European quantum ecosystem

Large private financing rounds in deep tech can accelerate progress and signal investor confidence. For the European innovation ecosystem, IQM’s raise matters in several ways. It underlines the capacity of European quantum startups to attract U.S. and institutional investors. It also shows that public innovation programmes such as the European Innovation Council can play a role in de‑risking early technology development and helping companies reach capital markets.

That said, private capital and early technology milestones do not eliminate the substantial technical and industrial risks associated with scaling superconducting quantum systems. Building reliable manufacturing lines, securing supply chains for specialised materials, recruiting and retaining skilled personnel, and delivering repeatable performance across many site installations will determine commercial success more than single fidelity metrics. Public investors and pension funds may be exposed to technology risk over a long development horizon.

Market and security considerations

Ten Eleven Ventures framed its investment in the context of cyber and secure computing. That reflects an emerging overlap in investor communities because quantum technology has implications for cryptography, for secure hardware and for next generation computing architectures. A vocal industry narrative ties quantum computing to national competitiveness and digital sovereignty. European policymakers have highlighted the strategic value of quantum technology and the EIC involvement here signals alignment between private capital and public strategic objectives.

Questions and caveats to watch

The key claims and plans in IQM’s announcement raise a set of practical questions. How rapidly can chip fabrication yield and module assembly be improved while keeping coherence and gate performance? What is the realistic timeline for achieving error corrected logical qubits at scale? How will IQM translate R and D leadership into sustainable commercial revenues given competition from U.S., Chinese and other European players? How exposed are investors to the long timelines typical of foundational hardware scale ups? Answers to these questions will matter to customers, suppliers and public investors.

What to watch next

Watch for public technical milestones such as demonstrations of error reduction schemes, small scale error correction experiments, improvements in multi qubit coherence across integrated modules, expansion of fabrication lines in Finland and new commercial deals for on-premise deployments. Monitor regulatory and export control developments that affect cross-border sales and supply chains. Track board and leadership changes and how Ten Eleven’s involvement shapes U.S. market access and partnerships.

IQM’s Series B is a sizable vote of confidence from a mix of private and public investors. It will buy time and resources to pursue an ambitious roadmap. But the transition from high fidelity components to industrialised, fault tolerant quantum computers remains one of the hardest engineering challenges in computing. Continued scrutiny of technical evidence and transparent reporting of milestones will be critical for investors and policymakers who want to judge progress objectively.