How the EIC mobilised €20 million and related measures to support Ukrainian tech after February 2022

Brussels, February 24th 2023
Summary
  • ›The European Innovation Council launched a €20 million Horizon Europe call to support Ukrainian tech start-ups and SMEs with grants and services.
  • ›The targeted action aimed to deliver up to €60,000 each to at least 200 Ukrainian tech companies plus nonfinancial support via a pan-European network of partners.
  • ›By the 7 September 2022 submission deadline 12 eligible proposals were received and the evaluation completed in late 2022 with results promised for early March 2023.
  • ›Ukrainian organisations also engaged directly in mainstream EIC programmes with applications to the Accelerator, Pathfinder and Hop On facility.
  • ›EISMEA and the Single Market Programme supported parallel measures through the Enterprise Europe Network, cluster platforms, Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs and other programmes.
  • ›The measures are useful but modest relative to the scale of need and implementation complexity creates risks for timely impact.

How the EIC mobilised €20 million and related measures to support Ukrainian tech

In the first year after the full scale Russian invasion of Ukraine the European Innovation Council and the European Commission’s executive agency EISMEA put in place targeted measures to help preserve and scale Ukrainian innovation capacity. The most visible intervention was a dedicated €20 million Horizon Europe amendment to fund a Ukraine-specific action under the EIC work programme. That action was intended to combine small direct grants with business support and network building to help Ukrainian start-ups survive, relocate temporarily if needed and connect to European markets and investors.

The €20 million Ukrainian tech call: structure, aims and status

The Commission amended the EIC 2022 work programme to open a targeted call (HORIZON-EIC-2022-UKRAINIANTECH-01) allocating €20 million to a pan-European consortium to support Ukrainian tech start-ups and SMEs. The call combined direct small grants with business acceleration services. It was framed as emergency and resilience support but implemented through standard competitive proposal processes.

Main objectives of the €20 million action:- Support start-ups still located in Ukraine, companies relocated from Ukraine, and companies that have relocated back to Ukraine. - Provide direct financial support of up to €60,000 per beneficiary aiming to reach at least 200 Ukrainian tech start-ups and SMEs. - Provide nonfinancial support services, including business expertise, access to markets and networks.
Call administration and reach:The call sought to select a pan-European consortium of start-up associations and other partners from Member States working in cooperation with Ukrainian partners. It was intended to deliver grant micro‑support and to onboard Ukrainian innovators into wider European support channels such as the Enterprise Europe Network and EIC Business Acceleration Services.
ItemDetail
Call identifierHORIZON-EIC-2022-UKRAINIANTECH-01
Total budget€20,000,000
Per-company grantUp to €60,000 (innovation grants)
Targeted beneficiariesAt least 200 Ukrainian tech start-ups/SMEs
Deadline for proposals7 September 2022
Number of eligible proposals submitted by deadline12
Evaluation timingEvaluated in Q4 2022; results to be announced early March 2023

How Ukrainian actors engaged across EIC instruments

Beyond the specific €20 million call, Ukrainian organisations applied to mainstream EIC funding streams. Participation included applications to the multi-stage Accelerator, to Pathfinder research grants, and to the Hop On facility that allows widened participation in ongoing projects.

EIC instrumentApplications involving Ukrainian participantsSelected / invited
EIC Accelerator (three-step process)31 applications in Step 1 (short), 7 applications in Step 2 (full) from 5 distinct applicantsFinal interviews were ongoing at the time of reporting
EIC Pathfinder45 applications with Ukrainian participants4 projects selected for funding
Hop On facility (Pathfinder first call)7 applications received1 Ukrainian research institute invited to join an ongoing Pathfinder project
EIC Accelerator three-step process:The Accelerator uses a staged selection: Step 1 is a short application to screen ideas, Step 2 is a full application with detailed business plans and technology validation, Step 3 is an interview with a jury. For applicants with traction this route can combine grants and equity from the EIC Fund, but it is resource intensive and competitive.
Hop On facility explained:The Hop On facility allows research organisations from underrepresented or widening countries to join ongoing projects under Pathfinder or Pillar II actions. It is meant to increase inclusiveness and spread benefits beyond established consortia.

Outreach, visibility and ambassadorial support

The EIC worked to raise awareness of its funding streams inside Ukraine. A practical effort was the online workshop “The European Unicorn Factory: Funding Opportunities for Ukrainian Innovators” held on 21 April 2022 with the Ukrainian Start-up Fund and the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. A full recording was made available. The EIC also appointed a Ukraine-based entrepreneur, Sergey Sereda, as an EIC Ambassador in September 2022 to help reach local founders and feed experience back to the EIC.

Who is Sergey Sereda, EIC Ambassador:Sergey Sereda is the co-founder and managing partner of PIPES.one, an EIC Accelerator beneficiary. PIPES.one developed a mobile welding factory for large diameter polymer pipes, a technology pitched as faster, cheaper and greener for pipeline construction. The ambassador role is voluntary and intended to publicise EIC support and provide user feedback.

Other EISMEA and Single Market Programme measures supporting Ukraine

EISMEA coordinated several actions under the Single Market Programme, notably through the Enterprise Europe Network, the European Cluster Collaboration Platform and Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs. The aim was to combine financial support with practical market access, supply chain matchmaking and people mobility measures.

Enterprise Europe Network (EEN) actions:The EEN convened a Ukraine Task Force, helped reconstitute a Ukrainian EEN consortium and launched a set of pragmatic tools including a Supply Chain Resilience Platform and a Solidarity Lanes matchmaking portal to ease exports of Ukrainian goods and find alternative sourcing and logistics solutions.
European Cluster Collaboration Platform (ECCP) and cluster actions:The ECCP set up an EU Clusters Support Ukraine Forum to coordinate industry help and humanitarian responses. It organised a hybrid event in Košice on 29–30 March 2023 aimed at integrating Ukrainian clusters and firms into EU value chains and facilitating trade and investment links.
Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs (EYE) flexibility:EYE adapted quickly to the crisis by extending stays of Ukrainian entrepreneurs on exchange, allowing matches inside the host country for displaced entrepreneurs, and granting monthly allowances while waiving some usual cross-border rules to facilitate integration and maintain entrepreneurial momentum.
Intelligent Cities Challenge (ICC) contributions:Some city networks used their resources to share best practice, coordinate local services for displaced people and run targeted fundraising or aid campaigns aimed at keeping Ukraine’s critical infrastructure functioning through winter. These activities complemented national and EU-level policies.

Wider policy context and complementary EU support

The EIC measures sat alongside a larger set of EU commitments to Ukraine. Following Ukraine’s ratification the EU-Ukraine association to Horizon Europe and Euratom entered into force, enabling Ukrainian institutions to participate on equal terms. The Commission also announced temporary waivers of Ukraine’s financial contribution for 2021 and 2022 estimated at around €20 million and launched schemes such as ERA4Ukraine, Horizon4Ukraine, ERC for Ukraine and MSCA4Ukraine with a dedicated €25 million fellowship scheme for displaced researchers.

Horizon Europe association and waived contributions:Ukraine’s association to Horizon Europe removes formal barriers to collaboration and funding for its research organisations. The Commission temporarily covered Ukraine’s financial participation for 2021 and 2022 as part of broader solidarity measures.

Assessment and risks: what to expect and what to watch

The EIC and EISMEA responses included pragmatic and relevant measures, but several caveats are worth emphasising. First, the scale of the programmes is modest relative to likely needs for reconstruction and for preserving an innovation ecosystem under stress. €20 million aimed at 200 companies is useful but limited. Second, competitive processes and complex eligibility rules create friction and can slow delivery in crisis conditions. Third, centralised EU instruments can have limited reach if national and local business support channels are not well connected. Finally, relocations, IP ownership, and investor confidence are longer term issues that small grant programmes alone will not resolve.

Practical implementation risks:- Low takeup or few eligible proposals can reduce impact. The call received 12 eligible proposals by 7 September 2022 which is a small number given targets. - Administrative overheads and multi‑party consortia management can delay disbursement. - Ensuring added value beyond existing national supports requires tight coordination with NCPs, EEN members and regional funds. - Rapidly matching EU grant instruments with private investors remains challenging and depends on confidence in governance and IP protection.

Recommendations and indicators for monitoring impact

To judge effectiveness policymakers and stakeholders should monitor both outputs and outcomes. Short term metrics should include number of grants disbursed, time from selection to payment, numbers of beneficiaries receiving Business Acceleration Services and participation in matchmaking events. Medium term indicators should track survival and revenue growth of beneficiary companies, follow‑on investment raised and jobs retained or created. Given the potential for fragmentation the Commission and EISMEA should publish clear process milestones and coordinate with national schemes to avoid duplication.

Recommended short term indicatorsRecommended medium term indicatorsWhy it matters
Number of microgrants paid; time to first payment; number of companies reached by BASFollow-on private investment raised by beneficiaries; survival rate at 12 and 24 monthsShows whether funds reached intended recipients quickly and whether the support catalysed private capital and business continuity
Number of introductions to investors and corporates; number of trade missionsRevenue growth and jobs retained/created among beneficiaries; technology transfer or IP dealsMeasures market integration and the role of EU support in enabling commercialisation

Where to find results and follow developments

Formal information and updates were published on the EIC and EISMEA websites and the Funding and Tenders Portal. The EIC published a press release in June 2022 announcing the setup of the call and its objectives, and later public updates stated the number of proposals received and the timetable for evaluation. For those tracking impact, the EIC Data Hub and EISMEA communications are the official sources for award lists, follow‑on investment and programme evaluation.

Official pages to follow:- European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency (EISMEA) news pages - EIC work programme and call text on the Funding and Tenders Portal - EIC Data Hub for funded projects and companies - Enterprise Europe Network and European Cluster Collaboration Platform pages for parallel support

Bottom line. The EIC and EISMEA moved quickly to design targeted support for Ukraine’s innovation community and to adapt existing SME and ecosystem programmes to the emergency. The measures were relevant and pragmatic but modest in scale and dependent on multi‑layered implementation chains. The real test is whether grants, coaching and matchmaking were delivered fast enough and whether they helped firms secure follow‑on investment, preserve IP value in Europe and plug into supply chains during and after the conflict.