Hyperion Robotics: funding, procurement progress and the long road from prototype to industrial reliability

Hyperion Robotics, an Espoo based company that produces digitally manufactured foundations using robotics and new low carbon concrete, announced a €6.4 million growth round in 2026 and that it has entered commercial discussions with a major infrastructure corporation about supplying CE and UKCA certified low carbon foundations. The funding round is presented by the company and the European Innovation Council ecosystem as a milestone in moving from pilot projects and lab demonstrations to an industrial production model based on reproducible microfactories and a digital platform called Forge.

Origins and proposition

Hyperion was founded in 2020 by Fernando De los Rios, Ashish Mohite and Henry Unterreiner. The founders combine experience in finance, architecture and structural engineering and set out to change a construction sector they saw as slow to adopt new tools. Rather than cast foundations on site, Hyperion aims to produce engineered infrastructure elements in near site microfactories using robotic additive manufacturing, a tailored low carbon concrete and an integrated software workflow.

Technology, materials and claims

The company couples three technical components. First, computational design and engineering models that optimise geometry and structural layout. Second, robotic additive manufacturing hardware that produces freeform shapes in a factory setting. Third, a software stack named Forge that connects design, structural engineering, code compliance, robotics and factory operations into a single workflow. Hyperion also develops lower carbon binders and mixes through an EIC Pathfinder project called SCENE B or 3DGeoCarbon that funds material development alongside commercial work.

Hyperion publishes ambitious performance claims. The company states its process can use 70 to 75 percent less material compared with conventional construction, cut costs by 20 to 50 percent, accelerate programme times up to three times, and reduce embodied carbon by 50 to 70 percent depending on the application. It also cites an internal example where a foundation that began at around 40 percent lower emissions than a traditional equivalent now achieves roughly 80 percent lower emissions following further development of a carbon negative material.

Those numbers are important for the company’s pitch to infrastructure owners who face labour shortages, ageing assets and decarbonisation targets. They are also the kind of claims that need careful external verification. Embodied carbon and material savings depend on the assumptions in life cycle analysis, the boundaries used, transport and logistics, and how new binders are produced at scale. The company’s SCENE B Pathfinder project and subsequent scale up work are designed to address some of those material development questions while it commercialises production.

Regulatory and procurement positioning

A significant part of Hyperion’s strategy is to make its deliverables compatible with standard procurement practice. The company emphasises that its structural designs meet Eurocodes and local regulations and that elements leaving its factories are CE and UKCA marked. That approach helps lower the barrier for procurement teams and contractors who typically expect conventional product certification and prescriptive design references.

Hyperion frames the ability to deliver certified elements as a way to convert a technology pitch into a procurement decision. That is an important practical step because infrastructure owners are conservative and durability over decades is a central procurement criterion.

Commercial traction and clients

Hyperion’s reference clients in the UK include National Grid, Costain, Mott MacDonald Bentley, Anglian Water and United Utilities. These projects span energy, utilities, water and data centre sectors and are used to support the claim that the manufacturing model is sector agnostic rather than niche. The next commercial step for Hyperion is industrialisation through a microfactory network designed to keep logistics short and repeatability high.

Forge I, the company’s first UK production site, is planned for Flixborough near Scunthorpe in partnership with LKAB and is intended to manufacture components for energy, utilities, water, data centre and carbon capture projects. The microfactory strategy depends on the ability to replicate and certify production processes across sites, and on demand density that makes multiple small plants commercially viable.

Funding and investors

Hyperion’s announced €6.4 million growth round was co led by Course Corrected and the EIC Fund. Other participants included RE Ventures, part of the Romande Energie Group, and existing backers Lifeline Ventures, Übermorgen Ventures and PC Rettig Impact & Co. The total capital raised by Hyperion after this round is reported at nearly €17.4 million. The stated uses for the new capital are launching Forge I, continued development of the Forge platform and geographic expansion across European infrastructure markets.

Role of EIC programmes and corporate matchmaking

Hyperion’s progress has been supported by multiple EIC Business Acceleration Services. The company was selected for the EIC Accelerator in 2024 and participated in the EIC Investor Readiness and Outreach Programme, now branded EIC VentureMatch. It also took part in the EIC Corporate Partnership Programme where curated corporate days and multi corporate events are used to introduce startups to procurement, pilot and investment contacts within large corporations.

Visibility moments included a best pitch award for Hyperion on the Investor Day on Climate Tech at the EIC Summit 2025. Later, attendance at the EIC Multi Corporate Day at South Summit in Madrid in June 2025 is credited with connecting the company to procurement leads at major infrastructure firms and feeding into its current procurement discussions.

From pilot to industrial scale: the hard engineering and operational tests ahead

Founders and executives are candid that industrial scaling is a new category of challenge. A single demonstrated foundation in the ground proves feasibility. Opening a factory in a second country proves industrialisation potential. What remains is demonstrating operational reliability around the clock and year round. That means process robustness, QA, supply chain continuity for novel binders, and predictable throughput under variable site demands and weather conditions.

Technical testing of strength, freeze thaw, chemical resistance and long term creep and shrinkage must be convincing for asset owners who expect infrastructure to last a century or more. Even with CE and UKCA markings, procurement teams will want independently judged long term performance evidence and supply guarantees.

Commercial and policy implications

If Hyperion can demonstrate that its digitally manufactured foundations are cheaper, faster and measurably lower carbon at scale the effect on procurement could be significant for energy and utilities infrastructure programmes in Europe. Labour shortages and decarbonisation goals increase the appetite for automation, but cost still determines adoption. Hyperion’s CTO has suggested budgets will be the accelerator of change because cost shapes how organisations respond to labour shortages, ageing assets and decarbonisation targets.

The company expects policy support to matter. Standardisation, procurement frameworks that foster innovative bids, and clearer rules for how low carbon materials are assessed in public tenders would accelerate adoption. The broader lesson for policymakers is that technological innovation matters but policy and procurement levers are critical to scale industrial change in conservative sectors such as infrastructure.

Risks, uncertainties and caveats

Prominent claims about material reductions and carbon savings should be treated as provider reported until confirmed by independent third party life cycle assessments and verified in multiple operating environments. The transition from lab and demonstration to continuous industrial operation may reveal throughput bottlenecks, material supply constraints, or unforeseen quality issues. Microfactories rely on repeatability across dispersed sites which increases operational complexity compared with a centralised plant model.

On the market side there are procurement risks. Large infrastructure clients are risk averse by design. Even with certification, a new material and manufacturing model must be defensible in legal, insurance and long term maintenance terms. Achieving sufficient demand density near microfactory sites is an economic constraint often overlooked when proposing multiple local plants.

What to watch next

Important near term indicators of whether Hyperion’s model scales will include: reliable weekly output from Forge I at Flixborough; third party verification of carbon and material reduction claims; successful closure of the procurement deal currently under negotiation; demonstration that SCENE B materials can be produced at industrial volumes without shifting emissions upstream; and the ability to replicate factory processes in another country with consistent certification outcomes.

Conclusion

Hyperion Robotics is at a classic scaling inflection point for deep tech in traditional industries. The company has moved beyond a single demonstration to raise growth capital, win certification and begin procurement discussions with a major infrastructure owner. That progress reflects business development, technology maturation and the practical value of curated introductions through EIC programmes. The more difficult and telling work starts now. Hyperion must prove industrial reliability, demonstrate independent validation of material and carbon claims, and show that its microfactory model can be economically and operationally replicated across multiple sites. Success will require not only technical execution and investor backing but also procurement friendly evidence and, arguably, policy support to remove asymmetric risks for buyers.

Quick glossary